Skip to Main Content

Buildings

Basic Site Details

University of Edinburgh, Student Centre
Edinburgh
Scotland
The \'Dome\' was Phase III of Morris & Steedman\'s scheme for the student centre.

Alternative Names

The following alternative names are associated with this building/design:

Alt classic

NameCurrent NameNotes
Potterrow
The Dome

Building Type Classification

The building is classified under the following categories:

Class classic

ClassificationOriginal ClassificationNotes
UniversityNot Known

Street Addresses

The following street addresses are associated with this building:

Str Add classic

AddressCurrent AddressNotes
Potterow
1-5 Bristo Square

Events

The following date-based events are associated with this building:

event classic

Event TypeFromToNotes
Build/construction19661973
Proposed1967/12To cost £400,000.
Completion1976Phase III
Addition1998

People

Design and Construction

The following individuals or organisations have carried out design/construction work. Where architects or practices worked together, matching letters appear beside their names in the Partnership Group column.

design classic

PersonPartnership GroupRoleFromToNotes
James Shepherd MorrisAArchitect19661976Partner-in-charge
Morris & SteedmanAArchitectural practice19661976
Robert Russell SteedmanAArchitect19661976
J D Gibson & SimpsonSurveyors1967
Roy NimmoAArchitect1976Project architect for Phase III

Related Buildings, Structures and Designs

References

Bibliographic References

The following books contain references to this building:

bio ref classic

AuthorYearTitlePartPublisherNotes
Bailey, Rebecca M1996Scottish architects' papers: a source bookEdinburgh: The Rutland Pressp131
Gifford, John, McWilliam, Colin and Walker, David M1984Edinburgh (The Buildings of Scotland)Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltdp245
Willis, Peter1977New architecture in Scotlandp42-3

Periodical References

The following periodicals contain references to this building:

period ref classic

Periodical NameDateEditionPublisherNotes
Building1967/12/22p69
Architectural Review1968/01p52
The Herald2006/08/22Criticism of this building.